Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I currently have the following formula in a cell:
IF(AND(J40=12,J41="YES"),"Multiple",IF(J39="","",I F(AND(B48="NO",J40=6),SUM(B39,B41,B43)*3,IF(B48="Y ES",SUM(B49:B52,B41,B43,B43,B45),IF(AND(B46="YES", D54="YES"),(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B45),IF(B46="YES",( ((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45),IF(D54="YES",(((+B39+B41+B 43)*2)+B45),(((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45+B45)))))))) I want to add another condition: IF(AND(J40=4,B48="YES"),(B50+B51)*2) Any ideas on how to get past the limitation of 7? Maybe a better, more condensed, way to write the formula? |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think you can get past the limitation, unless that's a feature in
Excel 2007 I can't really test this because I don't understand the logic and I don't have the data. But, splitting it down, you see: IF(AND(J40=12,J41="YES"),"Multiple", IF(J39="","", IF(AND(B48="NO",J40=6),SUM(B39,B41,B43)*3, IF(B48="YES",SUM(B49:B52,B41,B43,B43,B45), IF(AND(B46="YES",D54="YES"),(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B4 5), IF(B46="YES",(((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45), IF(D54="YES",(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B45), (((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45+B45)))))))) It looks as though two conditions have the same result: IF(AND(B46="YES",D54="YES"),(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B4 5), IF(D54="YES",(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B45), So, maybe you could combine them, removing one of the IF statements: IF(OR(AND(B46="YES",D54="YES"),D54="YES"),(((+B39+ B41+B43)*2)+B45), I think that might mean the B46="YES" test is redundant but I'm not sure. Anyway, if that works, you can add another IF statement. I have to be honest and say that I think this will be a nightmare to check and prove. And, in a few months time you'll probably have no idea what you were trying to do. More to the point, neither will anyone else. As an example, you seem to have some repetition of cells: IF(B48="YES",SUM(B49:B52,B41,B43,B43,B45), 2 x B43 (((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45+B45)))))))) 2 x +B45 But, I'm sure you know what you're trying to do ... at least for the moment Regards Trevor "RRDMAT" wrote in message ... I currently have the following formula in a cell: IF(AND(J40=12,J41="YES"),"Multiple",IF(J39="","",I F(AND(B48="NO",J40=6),SUM(B39,B41,B43)*3,IF(B48="Y ES",SUM(B49:B52,B41,B43,B43,B45),IF(AND(B46="YES", D54="YES"),(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B45),IF(B46="YES",( ((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45),IF(D54="YES",(((+B39+B41+B 43)*2)+B45),(((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45+B45)))))))) I want to add another condition: IF(AND(J40=4,B48="YES"),(B50+B51)*2) Any ideas on how to get past the limitation of 7? Maybe a better, more condensed, way to write the formula? |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Excel 2007 does increase the nesting limit to 64 levels. But, upgrading to
2007 may not be an option for you at this time. Trevor's suggestion to eliminate redundancies is good advice, and may be adequate for your immediate needs. However, here's a trick to get around the nesting limitations in older versions of Excel. You can concatenate multiple IF statements together, rather than nesting inside of one another. =IF(A1="A","TRUE","")&IF(A1=""B","TRUE","")&IF(A1= "C","TRUE","") etc... This will work as long as only 1 condition will ever evaluate to TRUE. Also, the final result will be a text value, but if you need a number you can enclose the entire thing in a VALUE() function. Ok, hopefully that all makes sense. HTH, Elkar "Trevor Shuttleworth" wrote: I don't think you can get past the limitation, unless that's a feature in Excel 2007 I can't really test this because I don't understand the logic and I don't have the data. But, splitting it down, you see: IF(AND(J40=12,J41="YES"),"Multiple", IF(J39="","", IF(AND(B48="NO",J40=6),SUM(B39,B41,B43)*3, IF(B48="YES",SUM(B49:B52,B41,B43,B43,B45), IF(AND(B46="YES",D54="YES"),(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B4 5), IF(B46="YES",(((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45), IF(D54="YES",(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B45), (((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45+B45)))))))) It looks as though two conditions have the same result: IF(AND(B46="YES",D54="YES"),(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B4 5), IF(D54="YES",(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B45), So, maybe you could combine them, removing one of the IF statements: IF(OR(AND(B46="YES",D54="YES"),D54="YES"),(((+B39+ B41+B43)*2)+B45), I think that might mean the B46="YES" test is redundant but I'm not sure. Anyway, if that works, you can add another IF statement. I have to be honest and say that I think this will be a nightmare to check and prove. And, in a few months time you'll probably have no idea what you were trying to do. More to the point, neither will anyone else. As an example, you seem to have some repetition of cells: IF(B48="YES",SUM(B49:B52,B41,B43,B43,B45), 2 x B43 (((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45+B45)))))))) 2 x +B45 But, I'm sure you know what you're trying to do ... at least for the moment Regards Trevor "RRDMAT" wrote in message ... I currently have the following formula in a cell: IF(AND(J40=12,J41="YES"),"Multiple",IF(J39="","",I F(AND(B48="NO",J40=6),SUM(B39,B41,B43)*3,IF(B48="Y ES",SUM(B49:B52,B41,B43,B43,B45),IF(AND(B46="YES", D54="YES"),(((+B39+B41+B43)*2)+B45),IF(B46="YES",( ((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45),IF(D54="YES",(((+B39+B41+B 43)*2)+B45),(((+B39+B41+B43)*4)+B45+B45)))))))) I want to add another condition: IF(AND(J40=4,B48="YES"),(B50+B51)*2) Any ideas on how to get past the limitation of 7? Maybe a better, more condensed, way to write the formula? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nested If statements | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Nested if statements - is there a better way? | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Nested If Statements | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
what is the max no. of nested Ifs can an If Statements have in EXC | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Do I need nested IF statements? | Excel Worksheet Functions |