Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to graph my buisnesses departmental sales for 2004, 2005, 2006 as well
as the total sales for those years. If I use the same y-axis for the departments and total, the department bars are too small to be meaningful. I would like to graph the total sales against the right hand y-axis. I have tried the secondary axis but Excel lumps the Total numbers into the first department. Any Suggestions?? |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Typically a graph is meant to visually show the similarities and
differences or cycle-to-cycle changes between related groups of figures. For instance: a graph of swimwear department sales would show a decline in winter months and an increase in summer months. Including the "total sales for all departments" figure in that graph skews the scaling of the graph (as you've found out) and includes unnecessary data in your comparison, because although swimwear dept. sales are a part of total sales, you can't tell from the graph what part of total sales is swimwear (unless it's a separate pie chart). My suggestion is: remove "total sales all departments" from the departmental graphs and include a summary graph showing total sales for 2004 2005 2006. |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave O has a point. If you are using secondary axis to display the data,
Excel will shove the bars over each other, if thats what you mean. This happens if you have a 3-dimentional graph. Change it to a 2 dimentional chart and it should be OK If I misunderstood, please ignore Cheers Eddie "Dave O" wrote: Typically a graph is meant to visually show the similarities and differences or cycle-to-cycle changes between related groups of figures. For instance: a graph of swimwear department sales would show a decline in winter months and an increase in summer months. Including the "total sales for all departments" figure in that graph skews the scaling of the graph (as you've found out) and includes unnecessary data in your comparison, because although swimwear dept. sales are a part of total sales, you can't tell from the graph what part of total sales is swimwear (unless it's a separate pie chart). My suggestion is: remove "total sales all departments" from the departmental graphs and include a summary graph showing total sales for 2004 2005 2006. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
figuring commissions based on gross sales | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
sales needed to cover costs that increase as sales do | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Dynamic Range with unused formula messing up x axis on dynamic graph | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
Hyperlinkage of one graph with another graph or Drill down graph | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
I'm trying to get a custom graph in Excel | Charts and Charting in Excel |