Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
At the occurence of a blank cell in the series of X values of an XY chart,
the chart automatically change to a line chart (which is useless in the context). This drastically reduces the efficiency of Excel, for example: 1) I have to use double records of data, one containing blanks for statistical operations and one containing #NA for XY charting 2) A single series chart can transform into charts of 20 or even hundreds of series to circumvent the problem This problem occurred in Excel 2003, MIcrosoft Office 2003 professional edition |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Click on chart; use Tools|option and open Chart tab; check the box: How to
treat blanks-interpolated best wishes -- Bernard V Liengme www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme remove caps from email "Oscar II" <Oscar wrote in message ... At the occurence of a blank cell in the series of X values of an XY chart, the chart automatically change to a line chart (which is useless in the context). This drastically reduces the efficiency of Excel, for example: 1) I have to use double records of data, one containing blanks for statistical operations and one containing #NA for XY charting 2) A single series chart can transform into charts of 20 or even hundreds of series to circumvent the problem This problem occurred in Excel 2003, MIcrosoft Office 2003 professional edition |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
1) I have to use double records of data, one containing blanks for
statistical operations and one containing #NA for XY charting People have such a problem with this, but in fact, it's best to have THREE (or more) ranges of data. The first is the original data itself. The second is the data nicely formatted for tabular display, linked to the original data. The third is the data processed to be included in a chart, linked to the original data. If the source data for further processing (stats, etc.) must be different, then you need even a fourth range, linked to the original data. All of these ranges need not clutter up the same sheet. It may be best to have the original data on a separate sheet, perhaps hidden to prevent someone altering it, then put the chart on the sheet with the tabular display data. If you're worried about how much memory you're wasting, stop. Worksheets are cheap on modern computers, and it saves you lots of time if you don't have to keep fretting about optimizing the data for too many purposes at once. - Jon ------- Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP Peltier Technical Services Tutorials and Custom Solutions http://PeltierTech.com/ _______ Oscar II wrote: At the occurence of a blank cell in the series of X values of an XY chart, the chart automatically change to a line chart (which is useless in the context). This drastically reduces the efficiency of Excel, for example: 1) I have to use double records of data, one containing blanks for statistical operations and one containing #NA for XY charting 2) A single series chart can transform into charts of 20 or even hundreds of series to circumvent the problem This problem occurred in Excel 2003, MIcrosoft Office 2003 professional edition |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Problems using Excel 2000 to open/save file saved in Excel 2003 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel 2003 crashes loading excel files created Excel 2000 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Microsoft Excel 2003 and Hyperion Retrieve with Excel 2000. | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel 2003 V's Excel 2000? | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
sharing/using/saving Excel 2002 files in Excel 2003 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |